Showing posts with label Nazi looted art. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Nazi looted art. Show all posts

Apr 23, 2017

DATABASE: Download the Entartete Kunst inventory


"The V&A holds the only known copy of a complete inventory of 'Entartete Kunst' confiscated by the Nazi regime from public institutions in Germany, mostly during 1937 and 1938. The list of more than 16,000 artworks was produced by the Reichsministerium für Volksaufklärung und Propaganda (Reich Ministry for Public Enlightenment and Propaganda) in 1942 or thereabouts. It seems that the inventory was compiled as a final record, after the sales and disposals of the confiscated art had been completed in the summer of 1941. The inventory’s two typescript volumes provide crucial information about the provenance, exhibition history and fate of each artwork.

Download the Entartete Kunst inventory
(It's presented in two separate files:)

http://www.vam.ac.uk/__data/assets/pdf_file/0020/240167/Entartete_Kunst_Vol1.pdf

http://www.vam.ac.uk/__data/assets/pdf_file/0003/240168/Entartete_Kunst_Vol2.pdf

View a few pages from the Degenerate Art Inventory



***

see also:

Hermann Göring
http://wikidata.dbpedia.org/page/Q47906


Apr 15, 2017

Belgium to publish all looted works of art in its public collections on a central website?

March 2017: Lootedart.com published the news that the Flemish Culture Minister agrees on the "desirability of Belgium publishing all looted works of art in its public collections on a central website". No date has been set yet. 

In February journalist Geert Sels revealed in De Standaard that 78 looted works of art returned to Belgium after the war remain unpublished. 

This led to questions in parliament. Below is the exchange in parliament translated from the Dutch by Google Translate (see original questions here)

https://www.vlaamsparlement.be/commissies/commissievergaderingen/1121478/verslag/1123854

Jean-Jacques De Gucht (Open VLD)
The Netherlands pursuant database Origins Unknown 1621 paintings before which the country does not know to whom they belong because the owners are deceased, have fled or did not report. There are also works that were shipped after the war by mistake from Germany to the Netherlands.

Many art collectors in the Netherlands and Belgium were forced to offer their property for sale to middlemen acting on behalf of individuals within the Nazi regime. It also happened that the Nazis stole the work directly or confiscated from prisoners or the persecution of the Jews.

Netherlands has set up an independent advisory committee which includes advises the Minister on claims to objects in the national collection and works of art owned by the state at the local level, the provincial level and so on.

Our country pursued this matter earlier research. I refer to the Commission for the compensation of the members of the Jewish Community of Belgium, which has terminated the investigation and handling of the applications for compensation on December 31, 2007. The secretariat of the commission also put stop work. The succession is assured from January 1, 2008 by the services of the Chancellery of the Prime Minister and today under the Federal Science Policy.

Today I learn from the press that many of the 78 paintings who returned after the war from Nazi Germany and are in our museums have no conclusive provenance. Unlike our neighboring countries such as the Netherlands, Belgium, the documents were taken into custody, never made public.

Minister, what is your reaction to the recent revelations which indicate that we are a significant number of the 78 paintings who returned after the war have no clear origin?

Are there cultural moment in museums, cultural institutions and public buildings of the Flemish Community who returned after World War II to our country but in fact have their origins in other countries? Can you possibly explain?

Are you willing to go to the Dutch example and as I have already argued, to set up a website where all suspicious pieces are clearly displayed? If not, why not, since there are clearly problems with the origin of several pieces? If yes, please explain in detail regarding the timing and content?

Chairman
Gatz minister has the floor.

Minister Sven Gatz
Mr De Gucht, I have read with interest the article Art das Reich. I liked it, probably like many of you, interesting reading, which to reflect on.

I welcome this question, outlining the larger framework. Thanks to the many and hard work of the Study of Jewish property and compensation committee of the Belgian government to compensate the Jewish community in Belgium and abroad during the 90 losses for the major financial she suffered during the occupation in Belgium .

With the payment of the final compensation in the course of the work of the committees were established and the transfer of the latest resources from the compensation to the Jewish community in Belgium, in 2008 came an end to the responsiveness and handling claims of Jewish victims of World War II. When the compensation paid slew partly on shortly after the end of World War II from Germany to Belgium returned art.

Most of these works were then auctioned publicly, some were entrusted to Belgian museums. From the museums entrusted artworks came pretty much from the collections of antique dealers who more or less had made common cause with the Germans and German art sold at public or semi-public collectors.

In Public Kunstbezit Flanders (OKV) is done including the story of the unsuccessful attempts of these dealers to get reimbursed by them when selling art on the grounds that they were forced to sell.

Belgium, however, endorsed in 1998. The Washington Principles on Nazi-confiscated Art. It is eleven non-binding principles, summarized, tantamount to states, to the extent possible and within their own legal system, should take initiatives to facilitate the restitution of stolen works of art by the Nazis. Sell ​​under duress is then treated in the same furnace.


In Belgium, use the public authorities as a principle that if it can be shown that the artwork was stolen by the Nazis and was acquired forcibly through a sale to be returned to work or that alternatively pay a compensation to the descendants of the Benade... (for more, please consult the original Dutch article)


Apr 7, 2017

Provenance at the Philadelphia Museum of Art

The Philadelphia Museum of Art Provides the Following List of Collection Works That Changed Ownership In Continental Europe, 1933-1945 in PDF format


See also: Online Records with Provenance  and the Nazi Era Provenance Internet Portal for the Philadelphia Museum of Art

"Philadelphia Museum of Art List of Collection Works That Changed Ownership In Continental Europe, 1933-1945

The information on these pages represents our current state of knowledge and will be updated as research progresses. We welcome any additional information that would help complete or clarify the provenance of these works, at provenance@philamuseum.org.

Jean (Hans) Arp, French (born Germany), 1886 - 1966 Vase—Bust 1930 Wood 12 1/4 x 9 3/4 x 2 3/8 inches (31.1 x 24.8 x 6 cm) A. E. Gallatin Collection, 1947 Provenance A. E. Gallatin, New York, purchased from the artist, summer 1933 [1]; gift to PMA, 1947. 1. See Gail Stavitsky, The Development, Institutionalization, and Impact of the A. E. Gallatin Collection of Modern Art [Ph. D. diss., New York University], 1990, v. 1, p. 248, and v. 6, p. 4. The acquisition was announced in a Gallery of Living Art press release, December 9, 1933.

Jean (Hans) Arp, French (born Germany), 1886 - 1966 Constellation 1932 Wood 27 1/2 x 33 3/8 x 1 1/2 inches (69.9 x 84.8 x 3.8 cm) The Louise and Walter Arensberg Collection, 1950 1950-134-2 Provenance Marcel Duchamp (1887-1968), Paris; sold to Louise and Walter C. Arensberg, Los Angeles, 1937 [1]; gift to PMA, 1950. 1. See letter from Duchamp to Arensbergs, September 8, 1951 (PMA Arensberg Archives, CA Use Tax file), stating that he sold them the work from his private collection. A series of letters from Galka Scheyer in Hollywood to Hans Arp in 1933-1934 discuss a relief referred to only as "Configuration in White" or "das weisse Relief" purchased by the Arensbergs through Scheyer. Since "Constellation" is the only work by Arp in the Arensberg collection as bequeathed to the PMA in 1950, either the Arensbergs acquired a different work of his and subsequently sold or traded it, or Duchamp was mistaken and "Constellation" was purchased through Scheyer in 1933.

Georges Braque, French, 1882 - 1963 The Cup 1917-18 Oil and graphite on cardboard Sheet: 25 x 18 7/8 inches (63.5 x 47.9 cm) The A. E. Gallatin Collection, 1952 1952-61-6 Provenance A. E. Gallatin, New York, 1936, probably acquired directly from the artist [1]; bequest to PMA, 1952. 1. See Braque's dedication on the front of the painting "à M. Gallatin/ G. Braque/ 1918", and also Gallatin's Museum of Living Art press release of October 27, 1936 stating that the new acquisition came from Braque's studio: the artist "for many years refused to part with it. It hung always over the door of his studio in Paris, and not until this year could he be persuaded to allow it to pass into an American museum."

Georges Braque, French, 1882 - 1963 Figure 1920 Plaster 8 1/4 x 3 1/2 x 3 1/2 inches (21 x 8.9 x 8.9 cm) The A. E. Gallatin Collection, 1952 1952-61-10 Provenance With Galerie Simon, Paris; sold to A. E. Gallatin, 1933 [1]; bequest to PMA, 1952. 1. As per letter of September 18, 1987, from Maurice Jardot, Galerie Louise Leiris, to Gail Stavitsky; see Stavitsky, The Development, Institutionalization, and Impact of the A. E. Gallatin Collection of Modern Art [Ph.D. dissertation, New York University], 1990, v. 6, p. 38.

Georges Braque, French, 1882 - 1963 A Teapot and a Plate of Cheese 1942 Oil on canvas 13 5/16 x 21 13/16 inches (33.8 x 55.4 cm) The Louis E. Stern Collection, 1963 1963-181-4 Provenance Private collection, Lyon, France (?), or from the artist? [1]; Mr. Poyet [probably Galerie Alfred Poyet], Paris [2]; with Sam Salz, New York, by 1952; sold to Louis E. Stern, New York, March 17, 1952 [3]; bequest to PMA, 1963. 1. The provenance provided by Salz to Stern cites the exhibition "De l'impressionisme à nos jours", Lyon, 1942. This painting was almost certainly no. 4, "Nature morte: L'heure du thÈ". Although it is not illustrated, the dimensions and placement of the signature and date match the PMA painting; moreover the Maeght catalogue does not list any other paintings matching this description other than the PMA work. The exhibition catalogue states that all of the paintings included belonged to Lyonnais collectors. 2. The provenance provided by Salz to Stern simply states "From the artist"; however, the Maeght catalogue, Paris, 1960, no. 24, states that the painting was formerly in the collection of M[onsieur] Poyet, Paris, probably to be identified as Galerie Alfred Poyet, which dealt in modernist works in the 1940's. The Louis E. Stern Collection catalogue, PMA, 1964, no. 14, p. 180, gives the provenance as "the artist; M. Poyet, Paris; Sam Salz, New York." None mention a Lyon owner. Maurice Covo, president of Renou & Poyet, Paris, states in a letter of 27 February 2003 (curatorial file) that although his firm has been unable to locate this painting in their records, Mr. Poyet's relationship with Braque was well known, and he had occasion to buy directly from the artist. 3. Copy of dated receipt from Salz to Stern in curatorial file.

Jan 11, 2017

Nazi looted art in Dutch museums

What is the painting’s provenance?

In 2009  the Dutch Museum Association began an investigation into artworks that had been stolen, confiscated or sold under duress during the Nazi era between 1933 and the end of the Second World War.  (***More recent link to investigation***)

163 museums out of 400 took part. (SEE MUSEUMS)  (***More recent link to MUSEUMS***)

http://www.museumacquisitions.nl/en/10/home/
http://www.museumacquisitions.nl/en/10/home/


A report on the progress of research into Nazi looted art and duress sales was written by Prof. dr. Rudi E.O. Ekkart and drs. Helen C.M. Schretlen (Publication: Museumvereniging, 2014) and is available here:


 The results of the research conducted by each museum have been posted on the website http://www.museumacquisitions.nl,

SEARCH ITEMS HERE   

https://www.musealeverwervingen.nl/en/46/objects/


The following items were identified in the Dutch Museum Report as having potentially problematic provenances.
 (source : https://www.museumvereniging.nl/Portals/0/6-Publicaties/Bestanden/MV_Herkomstonderzoek_DEF.pdf

Rijksdienst voor het Cultureel Erfgoed, Amersfoort
– C.M. Dijkman, Mill
– J.D. Scherft, View of a Church in a Village
– A. Huissem, Landscape
– F.H. Mondriaan, Woodland Path in Haagse Bos
– Anonymous, Portrait Nicolaas Rockox
– Anonymous, Portrait of Adriana Perez

Oct 24, 2016

Provenance research: excellent data base at the Getty

To search Knoedler dealer records, the Getty provides a powerful tool.

Its online provenance research database contains more than 43,700 records transcribed from the 15 stock books of Goupil & Cie/Boussod, Valadon & Cie in Paris (1846–1919) as well as nearly 40,300 records transcribed from the 11 painting stock books of M. Knoedler & Co. in New York (1872–1970). 

http://piprod.getty.edu/starweb/stockbooks/servlet.starweb?path=stockbooks%2Fstockbooks.web


The Getty has made Sales Catalogs, Goupil and Knoedler files available for download as CSV on Github.

SALES CATALOGS: https://github.com/thegetty/provenance-index-csv/tree/master/sales_catalogs

GOUPIL : https://github.com/thegetty/provenance-index-csv/blob/master/goupil/goupil.csv

KNOEDLER:  https://github.com/thegetty/provenance-index-csv/tree/master/knoedler


Hello world: New site for gathering useful links for provenance research

Links to searchable data bases will be added gradually. The aim is to make it easier for anyone who wants to research provenance to do so.
This is an open project. If you would like to contribute, please leave a message or contact through the site.
Thank you.